About This Framework
Methodology, scope, and caveats
Methodology
This taxonomy synthesizes multiple established frameworks in comparative religion to create a systematic, multi-dimensional classification of the world's major life frameworks.
Each tradition is analyzed across six taxonomy axes (cosmogony, values, purpose, suffering, eschatology, and practice) and scored on 13 functional dimensions using a combination of continuous (1-7 Likert) and categorical scales.
All scores require evidence citations linking back to deep-dive research documents, confidence levels, and documentation of known gaps or limitations.
Scope
The framework currently encompasses 29 traditions across 11 family groupings, spanning major world religions, indigenous spiritual systems, philosophical traditions, and new religious movements.
The term “life framework” is used rather than “religion” to accommodate traditions that do not self-identify as religions (e.g., Confucianism, Secular Humanism, Stoicism).
Important Caveats
- Any taxonomy necessarily simplifies the rich diversity within traditions
- Internal variation (denominations, schools, regional practices) is noted but not fully captured
- Western academic frameworks may introduce cultural bias in categorization
- Scores represent scholarly consensus, not definitive truth claims
- Living traditions continue to evolve; this is a snapshot, not a final word